CURRENT INVESTIGATIONS

CURRENT INVESTIGATIONS

Ryan Sullivan Ryan Sullivan

Whirlpool Service Plans

We are investigating certain appliance service plans for dishwashers that are sold under the brand names Amana, KitchenAid, Maytag, and Whirlpool that claim to cover the “repair or replacement” of the product, but fail to do so. If you have purchased this appliance service plan but did not get the repair or replace remedy you thought you would receive, contact us to discuss your case and a possible class action lawsuit.

Read More
Ryan Sullivan Ryan Sullivan

Cathode Ray Tube Product

Class action lawsuits have been filed in the United States District Court on behalf of persons or entities who purchased Cathode Ray Tube Products (CRT) indirectly from the world’s leading CRT manufacturers, including LG Philips, Samsung, Toshiba, Hitachi, Panasonic, MT Picture Display, Beijing-Matsushita Color CRT Co., Tatung Company of America, Chunghwa Picture Tubes…

Read More
Ryan Sullivan Ryan Sullivan

Lithium Ion Batteries

Green & Noblin, PC has filed a class action lawsuit in the United States District Court on behalf of persons or entities who purchased lithium ion batteries and/or products containing lithium ion batteries from the world’s leading lithium ion battery manufacturers, including LG Chem, Panasonic, Sanyo, Sony, Samsung, Hitachi, and Maxell Corporation of America.

Read More
Ryan Sullivan Ryan Sullivan

Valley Forge

If you purchased the common stock of Valley Forge Composite Technologies, Inc. (VLYF) between 1/1/09 and 2/6/13, you may have a claim. Green & Noblin is investigating whether Valley Forge falsely reported its revenues by including illegal exports of more than $37 million worth of semiconductors to Hong Kong, in violation of International Traffic In Arms Regulations. Valley Forge instead falsely reported that its revenues were from the sale of other aerospace products.

Read More
Ryan Sullivan Ryan Sullivan

Gypsum Antitrust Litigation

Green & Noblin was appointed Co-Lead Counsel representing people who purchased sheetrock during the time period from January 1, 2012 to the present. The case is pending in Philadelphia, PA and alleges that the makers of sheetrock conspired to raise and maintain the price of sheetrock products by over 30% at a time when demand was relatively low.

Read More